She points out: “In all seriousness, I never understand why people get so bothered by what other people choose to do with their lives. I shouldn’t have to constantly be on the defence, listing off my accomplishments just to prove that I am more than something that happened 13 years ago. I have.” The nudity of sexually proud women has been forever attacked.
I don’t do drugs, I hardly drink, I’ve never committed a crime—and yet I’m a bad role model for being proud of my body? It’s for sure one of the hugest double standards of modern feminists, mistaking something un-offensive for an attack on the rest of the sisterhood.
Emily Ratajkowski, infamous for taking charge of her sexuality but equally at the forefront of the scrutinised, was quick to brand the negative reaction to Kim K’s selfie sexist. Following her string of defensive tweets and having the last say, Kim penned an extended essay on her website.
Involvement of police even for those more passive distributors is possible, however, as are sanctions within the school environment, which is a topic for a future blog.One of the haughty problems with feminism is double standards.However, there is a narrow exception set out in the Supreme Court of Canada case of , that may exclude the exchange of sexual images between intimate partners, provided that the sexual relationship is legal (that is, complies with age of consent restrictions) and the images are kept exclusively by those two people.The age of consent to sexual activity generally is 16 in Canada, although 14-15 years olds can consent to sex with a person less than five years older, and 12-13 year olds can consent to sex with someone less than two years older.Police have not prosecuted teens for consensual sexting in Canada. in January 2015, where she both widely distributed the sexual images of her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend and engaged in a campaign of harassment and threats against the girl.
Sentencing varies, but is generally well below the maximum penalties: for instance, in the case of the two teens who took and distributed images of one of them having sex with 15 year old Rehteah Parsons, who tragically later died by suicide, they were each only sentenced to a year of probation, along with several other conditions.
Since the beliefs that parents want to instill in their children can vary greatly, we ask that, instead of adding your personal opinions about what is right or wrong in a film, you use this feature to help parents make informed viewing decisions by describing the facts of relevant scenes in the title for each one of the different categories: Sex and Nudity, Violence and Gore, Profanity, Alcohol/Drugs/Smoking, and Frightening/Intense Scenes.
Many parents are concerned about what their children might be doing online.
Kim has flaunted her body in the public domain numerous times – her book “Selfie” was pretty much half-naked snaps – the reaction from the public as well as celebrities was one that should’ve only happened if Mrs.
West’s body was a nationalized relic, like phone boxes or the NHS; snap judgement, catty comments and unrelenting abuse. In her tweet at KK, she hinted someone of her fame and position should be using it for role model-esque actions: “Realize how important setting goals are for young women, teaching them we have so much more to offer than our bodies.” She’s not but Kim offers more than her waist-trained hourglass.
If someone chooses to upload a candid photo of herself to humblebrag about her oozing curves, why the fuck not? It’s 2016 and women have been depicted nude for centuries, as actress Rowan Blanchard wisely points out.